This is a high quality software plugin that allows user's to launch affiliate sites quickly and eas

Friday, January 31, 2014

Jingdong would push ebook platform to against dangdang - Business

December 9,, the news from , said recently released ebook store jingdong will plan, roll out PC and mobile client software, but its not with hardware reading devices.

It is reported, jingdong , the first online books of the more than 80000 varieties, including the ebook, digital journal category, multimedia ebook, cooperation supplier more than 200.

plan to fully integrate resources, content, in the industry chain will be in the mainstream of the content providers cooperation, including the press, the publishing company, copyright company, writers, etc.; Downstream with many manufacturers will hardware, and at the same time, the will synchronize introduced support various mobile hardware equipment reading the client, including cell phones, tablet computer, handheld reader, etc. The first phase out first PC and Android system client, then releasing IOS, Windows Phone system client, and may be introduced with the reader of adaptation client.

However, and amazon Kindle reader to push sales ebook different, will not to do our own ebook hardware reading devices.

At present, the jingdong enterprise already and HanWang, a grand collaboration, roll out content mall

According to a disclosure, was launched after , and there are plans to launch the second half of 2012 digital music business.

It is worth noting that, in the near future, the dangdang network also announced will launch , including 90% in the following 10 yuan price paid , iOS and download Android mobile terminal applications download and has arises when their own electronic reader.

And the insiders, the launch of jingdong will also compete with dangdang .

Last year, the had and dangdang network for book business spread saliva war

December 9,, the news from , said recently released ebook store jingdong will plan, roll out PC and mobile client software, but its not with hardware reading devices.

It is reported, jingdong , the first online books of the more than 80000 varieties, including the ebook, digital journal category, multimedia ebook, cooperation supplier more than 200.

plan to fully integrate resources, content, in the industry chain will be in the mainstream of the content providers cooperation, including the press, the publishing company, copyright company, writers, etc.; Downstream with many manufacturers will hardware, and at the same time, the will synchronize introduced support various mobile hardware equipment reading the client, including cell phones, tablet computer, handheld reader, etc. The first phase out first PC and Android system client, then releasing IOS, Windows Phone system client, and may be introduced with the reader of adaptation client.

However, and amazon Kindle reader to push sales ebook different, will not to do our own ebook hardware reading devices.

At present, the jingdong enterprise already and HanWang, a grand collaboration, roll out content mall

According to a disclosure, was launched after , and there are plans to launch the second half of 2012 digital music business.

It is worth noting that, in the near future, the dangdang network also announced will launch , including 90% in the following 10 yuan price paid , iOS and download Android mobile terminal applications download and has arises when their own electronic reader.

And the insiders, the launch of jingdong will also compete with dangdang .

Last year, the had and dangdang network for book business spread saliva war





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Thursday, January 30, 2014

Simple Guitar Lessons - Entertainment - Music

Experience the Satisfaction of Mastering the Guitar in the Comfort of Your Own Home. The Most Popular Guitar Course Ever! Learning guitar has never been so easy, fun and cheaper that private lessons.We've been teaching simple guitar lessons online for over 6 years. Our comprehensive approach to teaching beginners to master the guitar has made us one of the most popular guitar courses of all time! Save your money on private lessons that will cost between $25 to $40 an hour!

Today we are recommended by thousands of guitar related sites all over the Internet. In fact, we currently receive visitors from a whopping 368,194 sources. 83% recommended In a recent customer satisfaction survey, 83% of Jamorama students surveyed said they would recommend Jamorama to their friends, family, and colleagues. Jamorama Guitar Lessons is the best learning guitar lessons course around. Jamorama guitar provides easy leaning to cater each individuals learning needs on playing the guitar. It has a wealth of solid instructional videos for any level. If you are just a beginner or advanced player, this is the course to use. Simple guitar lessons online is more efficient than taken private lessons. Private lessons can cost a lot of money and getting to in from the lessons another additional cost. With Jamorama guitar, you learn right at home from your computer. It's a great value.I highly recommend it.

Mechanical Royalties

The term mechanical royalties developed in the 1909 Copyright Act, and referred to payments for devices serving to reproduce sound. Even though devices haven't reproduced sound "mechanically' since the 1940's, the name has stuck and the monies paid to copyright owners for the manufacture and distribution of records are still called mechanical royalties. The rights to reproduce songs in records are known as mechanical rights.

The concept of a compulsory license for these mechanical rights grew out of a concern in Congress that the music industry was going to develop into a gigantic monopoly. This desire to keep copyright owners from controlling the world resulted in the compulsory license for records, which accomplishes its mission nicely. It says that, once a work has been recorded and released to the public, the publisher is required to license it to anyone else who wants to use it in records.

Compulsory Mechanical License

The compulsory copyright royalty provision for records is in Section 115 of the Copyright Act. It provides that, once a song has been recorded and released to the public, a copyright owner must license it: (a) to anyone else that wants to use it in a phonorecord which is a defined term in the Copyright Act; and (b) for a specific payment established by the law. However, the owner must give a compulsory license only if:

1. The song is a non-dramatic musical work

2. It has been previously recorded

3. The previous recording has been distributed publicly in phonorecords

4. Your recording doesn't change the basic melody or fundamental character of the song

5. Your use of the recording will be in phonorecords only

All of these conditions must exist before you get a compulsory license. Let's look at them:

Non-dramatic Musical Work. Before you can get the license, the song must be a non-dramatic musical composition. It's not clear what a dramatic musical composition is, but it's probably a song used in an opera or musical.

Previously Recorded. You can't get a compulsory license for the very first recording of work. The law allows the owner to control who gets it the first time, which is known as first use. Once it's recorded, however, anyone can get a compulsory license if the first recording was authorized by the copyright owner.

Public Distribution. The first recording must have been distributed to the public. This closes loopholes from the prior law, and is of course eminently logical. It's not enough that the publisher allowed a recording to be made if it wasn't released.

No Major Changes. When you get a compulsory license, you're allowed to arrange the song to conform to the style or manner of interpretation of the performance. However, you can't change the basic melody or fundamental character of the work.

Phonorecord Use. A compulsory license is available only for phonorecords, which are defined in the copyright law to mean audio only recordings. This definition was the publishers finest lobbying accomplishment in the 1976 Copyright Act, because it excluded home video devices from the definition of phonorecrds. This means there's no compulsory license for home videos, and the result has been that motion picture companies must now negotiate with every copyright owner or publisher for home video usage of each song, and that the owners free to charge whatever rate they choose. Access to guitar lessons, go here:

See you next post...





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Baidu open to sell the original ebook library - Business - Small Business

Yesterday, Shanghai wenhui press, too white art and literature press, blue lion, department culture forty-six copyright agency has reached an agreement with baidu library, in baidu's baidu bookstore in the library to launch "ten percent acquisition" activities.

The traditional book how to face a network share? The attitude of the publishing industry is not consistent: some people choose the uprising, last Monday, 30 writer and publisher of "writer rights alliance", announced that a conference in baidu library, apple is headed by the APPSTORE network company, and hope the litigation with five years of 1000 lawsuit "completely change online piracy infested situation"; Someone chose accepting amnesty, on Monday, Shanghai wenhui press, too white art and literature press, blue lion, department culture forty-six copyright agency has reached an agreement with baidu library, in baidu's baidu bookstore in the library to launch "ten percent acquisition" activities, in sales of more than 10000 the original ebook.

According to information, baidu library platform is published in March in baidu infringement disputes launched one of the strategies after, the platform including and copyright party concrete cooperation forms, as well as to the copyright partner support propaganda of several major parts, such as content. Baidu library operation manager said: "library cooperation platform set up two months, gets more and more recognition and welcome the copyright party, also the first batch of partners create value."

Yesterday, cool and all the staff to publish a personnel appointed mail, 6 nets announced cool vice President and chief editor ChenFeng for personal reasons to leave. At the same time, it also announced a series of appointments, executives, it is worth noting, the newly appointed six executives are big background.

The internal mail disclosure, cool 6 nets new appointed COO ShiYu will concurrently content department chief editor, and ZhangJianRong appointed for the product, XuHaiXia appointed vice President for technology, FengJie vice President for cool 6 assistant President, LiuJian concurrently cool 6 multimedia scientists, LvQing appointed chief part-time cool 6 chief intelligent computing scientists.

Reporter discovery, these new executives were from the group in a different business lines: ShiYu after ZongCaiBan director for the big group, ZhangJianRong served as a big game quality management, senior director XuHaiXia have had great platform design center manager, vice director of research center, holdfast CTO, sun CTO of the work time. FengJie is served as a senior director of finance its winger group positions. In the cool and concurrently scientists and LvQing LiuJian, the former is grand courtyard multimedia innovation, and the latter is dean, grand search dean, innovation.

Email ChenFeng also confirmed for personal reasons to leave. Company to put forward has So far, cool 6 nets founding executive team has left all, grand factions in comprehensive 6 nets. Cool





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

TV network copyright grow up fast - Business

Recently, a 30 sets of the TV series ", as well as more than 30 million yuan price sold to sohu video, single set price, it is said that the 1 million copyright, the domestic market a TV network copyright prices to new highs.

"This year the TV network copyright also will continue to rise, to my knowledge, is currently in the talk about a few TV show has more than the price." Yesterday, ShiWang, sohu video music related personnel all told reporters.

With a few big video website does not need the money later effects of competition intensifies, since this year, TV network copyright price increases amazing: sohu video 30 million yuan to buy the new return zhugege "(98), excellent cool with 25 million yuan to buy the little snow" (33), depending on the music with 20 million yuan to buy the temple of enrollment zhuan "(46 set), PPS spent 22 million yuan on the king's woman" (35 sets), each set price is in 300000 yuan of above.

According to introducing, around the end of 2008 in early 2009 was, sohu buy the popular TV show, a collection of also only $5000. Three years from 5000 to 100, one thousand sets, the price is 200 times, prices far above inflation rate.

TV network copyright up fast

"The first video website is no concept of, is all copyright by online upload video programs were to share. Then slowly building a new media copyright market." Sohu's staff said. And copyright the price also begin from 2005 of the hundreds of yuan, one thousand yuan a set, start up all the way.

2008 years popular show a collection of 5000 yuan or so, the most popular in the latent "sold to 10000 yuan per set. According to the chairman of sohu's statement, 2009 25000 yuan per episode of the empire had been in daqin is day price, and to now come to, 25000 yuan is only a fraction.

According to the personage inside course of study says, earlier this year, video website acquisition, popular TV show 200000 yuan/set you shout your; To the second quarter 300000 yuan/set, the popular show has to buy came; and Now, with popular TV episodes in 30 ~ 800000 yuan price. "As well as the one million yuan a set of records estimates will soon break. "It is said that the palace 2" foreign offer has up to 1.4 million yuan, still have people at a premium ". The price has risen, even more than the traditional television to buy TV prices.

"The next video site could be alone for broadcast show the market". Music ShiWang of zhao will party told reporters, so-called broadcast drama, is the website of TV rights to buy out, no longer distribution to other video website, the user to look on the net the TV show, can only go to the web site.

Video website listed, purse drum

Video website dare to buy the biggest day play style also is "not bad money". Optimal cool late last year in the United States, and get listed several rounds, earnings showed that its investment to the end of June had $625 million in cash; Potatoes now listed, recently about $200 million in cash; Sohu video of a us $600 million cash support; Odd art nets is back by baidu this big tree; Cool 6 nets in the grand support, at the end of the second quarter have $110 million in cash storage.

"Potatoes nets in the copyright content and was introduced, the play is a: large-scale investment." Potatoes nets CEO after wang wei in the listed so comment. To our reporter yesterday potato net source says, will roll out 100 million yuan bombing copyright and homemade play market.

The reporter learns, potato net has exclusive under the latter in jiangsu TV pandemic teleplay ", in the break, some of the sting scored when American shows of popular works alone, the broadcast rights in love with smile ", "love" and "different things profusion, such as records of the homemade play at the premiere or are hot pat. Wang wei, says potatoes expected in the near future can make a close to the quality of the HBO drama and homemade program.

Music ShiWang is ambitious plan to launch was alone in the PC, mobile phone, theater, cloud video super clear machine and so on many terminal online. It is said that, joy ShiWang won the 157 department exclusive network copyright, totaling 5300 YuJi programs.

Day price investment can be recovered

A set of dozens of popular TV show, frequently take 230 million buy copyright. Video site cast money, what can take back?

"Video website also enhance the profitability of in." Sohu video staff told me, took 30 million yuan to buy the return zhugege "as an example, first by the copyright distribution, sold to 7 home video website, that a have already been withdrawn all costs; 2 it is video ads, has received net more and more recognition, "the advertisers specific Numbers, can tell you not divulged the return zhugege" AD revenue is ten million yuan level." In addition, network video payment model is the present trend; At the same time sohu video also served as China mobile, China telecom, cell phone video content output sides of hits a surprising amount.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Monday, January 27, 2014

Piracy Isn't Being Avoided With The Antipiracy Foundation Scanner - Internet - Scams

Piracy, particularly in music, has become exceptionally easy, and because of the wide availability and accessibility of digital media, copyright violations have never been so widespread. Many people aren't even aware if and when they are violating copyrights or illegally using intellectual property. A new Trojan is hoping to capitalize on this confusion. The Antipiracy Foundation Scanner is using increased attention on digital piracy as a pressure tactic for computer users everywhere.

What is the Antipiracy Foundation Scanner?

There is no shortage of opportunity to view, download, or duplicate copyrighted material online, and many people do not realize what is copyrighted, what isn't, and what fair use is. This is partly what can make the Antipiracy Foundation Scanner, also known as ICPP Copyright Violation Alert, I-Q Manager, the ICPP Foundation, icpp-online.com, so effective. The Trojan issues warnings to computer users that illegally downloaded material has been found in their systems; they can either take their chances in court, or skip the heavy fines and possible jail time by opting for a "pre-trial settlement." What the computer user needs to know is that this is false. This warning can as easily appear on computers that have never had one item violate any copyright law, but again, because of the confusion and vague laws, it is hard for people to know if they have committed a violation that could come back to haunt them.

Signs of the Antipiracy Foundation Scanner

This particular Trojan is quite easy to identify after it has entered your system; it uses distinctive and detailed warning messages in order to persuade you that a pre-trial settlement will be in your best interest. If affected by the icpp-online.com Trojan, you will receive a warning as follows:

Copyright violation alert

Copyright violation: copyrighted content detected

Windows has detected that you are using content that was downloaded in violation of the copyright of its respective owners. Please read the following bulleting [sic] and try solving the problem in one of the recommended ways.

What has happened?

During the system scan Antipiracy Foundation scanner has detected copyright issues. Please take a look at the list and choose an action: pass the case to a court or settle it in a pre-trial order by paying a fine.

You are given the option of "Solving" the issue. This is an attractive option for many: they want the problem gone, solved. Again, though, this is a false message, and the only thing that the scanner will solve for you is what you should do with that $400 on your credit card. The alternative, according to the pop-up is a possible five-year prison sentence and up to $250,000 in fines.

These messages begin appearing continually, even after reboot. Here is another common one:

Warning!This computer is being used for illegal activity associated with copyright violation. Records about this computer's owner are about to be sent to court. If you saw this message by accident, please report any information about a possible owner of this comp.

Antipiracy Foundation Scanner is designed to elicit a fast and rash response, hoping you will see that your records are going to be sent to court, that you have engaged in illegal activities, and that you are unsure of whether or not you could have done something illegal. The Trojan doesn't want you to take a second glance and ask yourself why a law firm, such as ICPP Foundation claims to be, would scan your computer or issue warnings, why a court system would be waiting on their findings, or what laws, if any, you did actually break.

The warnings also appear to be affiliated with the RIAA and MPAA, which can give it an initial look of legitimacy. It will provide an "evidence list," which can also look convincing until you realize that none of the numbers make any sense. These details offer only a surface layer of legitimacy.

Clicking on any portion of these ads will direct you to the rogue ICPP website, which tells you:

We have developed effective and unique methods for organisations to enforce their intellectual rights. By working effectively with forensic IT experts, law firms, and antipiracy organisations, we seek to eliminate the illegal distribution of copyrighted material through our revolutionary business model.

The site also says their model is able to produce revenue for copyright holders and provide a sustainable solution for digital piracy. Neither of these assertions is true.

How Did the Antipiracy Foundation Scanner Trojan Enter Your System?

The icpp-online.com Trojan is distributed through scareware sites, which may include those with adult, gaming, social networking, freeware, or peer-to-peer content. Rogue sites can also use blackhat SEO techniques to rank high in search engine results, which can increase the chance you will click on one of the affected sites.

As soon as you see these signs, it is vital that you remove the Antipiracy Foundation Scanner as soon as possible to prevent system instability and vulnerability to security issues.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Palm Springs Lawyer Sebastian Gibson Unveils BURPS, the Bailout Uber-Rescue Plan Stimulus for CA Personal Injury Attorneys - Law - National, State, Local

WASHINGTON: In a breathtaking development that makes all prior bailout, rescue and stimulus plans including TARP Plans 1 through 15 pale by comparison, Palm Springs and Palm Desert Lawyer Sebastian Gibson today unveiled a 250 Trillion Dollar Bailout Uber-Rescue Plan and Stimulus (known both as BURP and BURPS) designed to give a boost to the nations troubled and often misunderstood lawyers by rescuing the heart of this countrys economy, its lawyers who, like much of the nation are depressed and stressed-out like never before.

While Congress which has been split down partisan lines over each of the previous bailout and stimulus plans proposed so far, with many of the Senators being former lawyers, Congress is said to be almost unanimous in their hunger for a plan like BURP. For the first time, Congress could come together to the dinner table in our countrys time of need to help feed our nations overburdened and unappreciated lawyers.

It remains unclear, however, whether President Obama, himself a lawyer, will be willing to sign the legislation once the House and Senate pass BURP. Speaking on condition of anonymity, a spokesman said, BURP may simply be too much to swallow.

If you need of an attorney with a sense of humor for a personal injury, business, real estate, patent, trademark, copyright, environmental, entertainment or international law anywhere in Southern California, visit our website at and call us at any of the numbers easily found on our website.

Using language only somewhat similar to what has been used by the nations Treasury Secretaries, but in some ways more graphic, Palm Desert Lawyer Sebastian Gibson stated that having BURPS could repair the part of our countrys anatomy that is in a word, most constipated. Warning that the nation faces the most serious economic crisis since lawyers went into depression in the 1930s, Sebastian Gibson said that BURPS are necessary to get the guts of this economy, its lawyers, functioning again. BURPS, he said, are necessary to get toxic matters, unemployed attorneys, out of the nations overburdened financial system, before the economy and the system shuts down completely.

Unlike TARP, which some have criticized for not having released sufficient funds, BURP is actually comprised of a number of smaller BURPS focused on various segments of the legal community such as personal injury lawyers, divorce lawyers, criminal lawyers and government lawyers. Designed this way to provide maximum relief, BURP has been praised for having at the center of its plan, these simultaneous releases (both large and small BURPS) designed to get the economy moving again before the financial system in this country shuts down completely and the recession becomes a full-blown depression.

It has taken Palm Springs Attorney Sebastian Gibson who comes from main street USA to be hailed as perhaps the one American with a vision that could actually stimulate the economy, applauded the broad support for BURP saying it was essential to have a BURP after all the other stimulus and rescue plans that have been causing so much gas among Americans and Congress. Without BURP, this build-up could have allowed the worst crisis in our history, to become a catastrophe, blasting away any hope of recovery.

The BURP plan includes help for legal victims of this gas build-up with over 47 Billion for health services including tax credits for the purchase of medications to prevent and relieve future financial indigestion and an 82 Billion credit for stomach relief medications for those already suffering from the bloating, cramping and other medical issues brought on by this crisis.

While some members of the media, notably those on Fox News, questioned the sanity of spending this amount of money to save this countrys lawyers from losing their jobs and bankruptcy, Palm Springs Attorney Sebastian Gibson reminded the detractors of the plan that there are now more lawyers than you can shake a stick at.

Speaking at a press conference, Gibson said, Right now, dysfunctional attorneys are like gallstones in the nations bowels. If all the lawyers in this country were to go on the unemployment lines, unemployment in this country would swell like an inflamed or overripe prostate, and eventually explode, causing panic in the streets and around the world.

While there was no comment from Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner about BURP, it was believed that many of the staff at Treasury were wondering why no one at the Treasury department had spit up a BURP plan of their own.

As BURP was being digested by Congress, Palm Springs and Palm Desert Lawyer Sebastian Gibson was said to be working on a more effective plan designed to help the nations financial system by discharging all of the CEOs of major financial institutions. Known only as BARFS (Bailout And Rescue of the Financial System), details are expected to be released next week.

Visit our website at and call us if you need a lawyer for a personal injury, business, real estate, patent, trademark, copyright, environmental, entertainment or international law matter anywhere in Palm Springs, San Diego, Orange County or anywhere in Southern California.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Saturday, January 25, 2014

Wedding ceremony Photography on DVD - Business

Much more wedding photographers nowadays are supplying full resolution and customized retouched JPEGs on DVD with total copyright release. But is obtaining your valuable wedding photographs on DVDs this kind of a wonderful strategy?

Some individuals, which include a couple of qualified photographers, believe DVDs may possibly only hold information for up to 8 to 10 a long time at ideal. This is most likely rather exact for most typical consumer grade DVDs. However, for archiving essential files, gold archival DVDs are offered which may well retain precious photographs and other files archived through a hundred many years. You could find suppliers of gold archival DVDs by only seeking with this phrase in all the well-liked investigation engines. As of time of this creating, gold archival DVDs expense all around $2.50 every. It is also superior to know that there are blu-ray discs for high definition wedding movies which may possibly count on to hold the video clip for over 200 years as effectively. To these photographers who are not so positive no matter if Gold Archival DVDs will maintain wedding ceremony images for so quite a few a long time, I remind them, gold is inert and does not oxidize. At mini mal, it is affordable to expect and imagine 24 karat gold enveloped in a scratch resistant coating must be more archival than the typical photo paper and chemical method which puts a wedding ceremony picture on leading of a sheet of paper! However, there are some photographers who want brides to feel the chemical course of action of placing an image on top rated of a sheet of conventional image paper is additional archival than 24 karat gold and which has been enveloped in a scratch resistant coating!

Brides who retain a professional wedding ceremony photographer who will give her wedding photographs on DVDs might want to make positive the photographer makes use of gold archival DVDs. Some professional photographers, including myself, will give on gold archival DVDs at a slightly higher price. Brides who prefer not to pay out the better charge for gold archival DVDs know they will just be working with the typical DVDs as a medium via which to get their wedding ceremony images for archiving on electronic storage media in its different varieties. The DVD is only a momentary moveable indicates of sharing individuals pictures with others to duplicate and print.

DVD technological innovation is therefore not a dilemma. But the principle of providing qualified wedding ceremony photography with entire resolution, customized retouched and complete copyright introduced JPEGs on DVDs is the basis of a non-conventional small business model for the marriage ceremony photographer. How does this new and expanding "DVD marriage ceremony photographer" business product assess to the classic "album package marriage ceremony photographer" model?

Initially thing you will discover which distinguishes these two photographers is the DVD wedding photographer does not contractually obligate the consumer to a marriage ceremony album at time of signing the wedding contract. The DVD photographer prefers to allow the consumer to initially perspective their wedding photographs. After the client has viewed her pictures, chosen her favorite horizontal, vertical and a variety of dimensions, it can be additional very easily decided the marriage ceremony album the bride will basically require which very best suits her particular demands and flavor. Album deal photographers on the other hand should obligate the bride to some pre-intended album bundle prior to the bride has seen any photography at all. Though this tends to make business perception and must be needed by the album offer photographer, it is purely in the self-fascination of the photographer and reveals no worry for the greatest curiosity of the bride.

The 2nd most distinguishing difference is that from the DVD wedding ceremony photographer the bride simply gets the important DVD of full resolution, tailor made retouched and entire copyright introduced images. This benefit is not even on the table with album bundle photographers. And what a list of sensible rewards the wedding ceremony DVD supplies to the bride!

1. Cropping, retouching, photo tilting, blowing-up and other innovative picture manipulation and management as she desires for her images and album(s).

2. If her photographer retires, moves out of state, passes absent, goes out of company, suffers a company catastrophe or whichever, the bride has her marriage ceremony photos! She has them!

3. If the bride's wedding album gets lost, broken or stolen, she can always very easily have another new album produced since she has her marriage ceremony DVD.

4. She does not have to spend the photographer a middle man payment to have prints made. She could deliver her pictures from her DVD to her favorite on the internet or nearby photo lab for printing at direct lab charges. Of program, we all know that album package deal photographers sure can have a center man payment tacked on print and album selling prices!

5. Most, nevertheless not all, album package deal photographers necessitate the bride and groom to place their album purchase inside 30 to 60 days right after the wedding ceremony date. This can generally be an inconvenience for the new couple just starting up and who have preparations to make to get their new everyday life together organized. Some photographers will rush the bride and groom via this approach and that seriously is not the best way to make sure the bride gets a marriage ceremony album she is going to really like. The DVD photographer does not require the invest in of a marriage ceremony album. If the bride desires to purchase one particular from her DVD photographer, she may possibly do so at her usefulness, on her schedule when she is ready. She might buy an album if she chooses from any one of the dozens of online album companies. It is her selection to do what she believes is finest.

6. Relying on the wedding contract, with the DVD marriage ceremony photographer, the bride does not have to spend for an album which she may possibly get rid of if she has to cancel her authentic wedding ceremony date. The only nonrefundable payment to the DVD marriage ceremony photographer is the booking retainer for the date. Any and all other dollars compensated on the contract to a DVD photographer is refundable in the function the wedding date is canceled or rescheduled.

There are other differences inherent among DVD wedding photographers and album bundle wedding photographers but these variances differ in how the two sorts of photographers opt for to handle those troubles in both their policies and contracts. That is further than the scope of this guide for me to address.

The reluctance of so several album deal photographers today to acknowledge the DVD photographer business design reminds me of the identical reluctance to swap to digital photography from film. So a lot of album package photographers were film photographers originally. It took a lot of of them several years in advance of doing the swap to the digital camera. Now that most of them have switched to digital photography, they nevertheless have this age-prolonged business mentality of putting their earnings mainly on the photographic prints and albums they provide. In this circumstance, they want to hold the "digital negatives" and full copyright ownership and cost an arm and a leg for pictures and albums. But this old pricing philosophy does not just take into account the inherent variances between digital photography and movie photography as the positive aspects of each relates to the shopper and even to the specialist photographer.

There are a ton of causes why album bundle photographers however hold to the previous small business model. I'm not guaranteed but I believe it is primarily due to photograph labs and album corporations which are consistently providing courses and incentives to maintain photographers imagining in terms of placing their profit on pictures and albums. In any other case, there would be a dramatic decrease in business for picture labs and specialist album firms. So photo labs and album businesses have a ton of reasons to maintain photographers considering in terms of inserting massive revenue on prints and albums.

But when it arrives to digital photography, there are a rising range of photographers who come to feel that we can present much better and far more productive services and solutions to our shoppers by way of a various organization method. Rather of pricing photographic prints and albums at significant ample prices to obtain our needed profits, we rather selling price our marriage ceremony photography capabilities and total resolution and custom retouched JPEGs at costs to acquire our necessary income. Unlike movie negatives which ended up useful only for printing pics from, our JPEGs are promptly viewable and pleasurable "as is" right out of our cameras. Since wedding ceremony photography customers might use JPEGs in an extensive assortment of approaches to involve digital journal fashion wedding ceremony albums and quite sophisticated slide reveals set to songs, our "digital negatives" are in truth a much more marketable or desirable photographic item than what images and marriage ceremony albums use to be. With all of today's digital products such as large 50" plus plasma monitors, becoming capable to check out one's marriage ceremony day photos as a sophisticated slide demonstrate set to music IS very frequently more fulfilling to modern brides than flipping by way of pictures in a little book.

When it comes to pricing our picture quality pictures, there are a handful of fundamental ways. Initially, the more substantial the JPEG, the higher the price tag for each JPEG. Secondly, some photographers sell their image quality JPEGs in amount discount rates. The a lot more photo quality JPEGs a bride purchases, the lower the value per JPEG. Also some photographers do not present a full copyright release and they surely will not transfer copyright ownership less than any situations. But some do and at a hefty earnings and then only after a particular minimum amount range of JPEGs have also been ordered. The idea behind this pricing strategy: We as qualified digital photographers are promoting our true work we are advertising what the huge vast majority of electronic media savvy consumers actually want to have - the digital negatives. Ultimately, we are nonetheless getting paid and handsomely for executing this!

Now, IF and when the customer wants to purchase pictures and albums, she may possibly do so whenever immediately after her wedding day. She may well even now purchase pictures and albums from her photographer or from any of the a lot of labs and album businesses on the internet. The alternative is hers.

This guide is not by any indicates meant to persuade album package deal photographers to switch to the DVD wedding ceremony photographer small business product. (I do not want the extra opposition). I've merely hoped to clarify why a lot of of us have adopted this method. I know this strategy to running a digital marriage ceremony photography organization is NOT for everyone. Specifically those photographers who sense they could lose cash on the added sales of images and albums if they give up entire resolution pictures and copyright. That is an extremely superior position in principle. And from time to time it is a practical reality. I've operated my business equally approaches about the decades. For me, I personally sense the benefits to my consumers and for my status far outweighs the reduction of some added cash flow. As a substitute, I want to make far more money serving a lot more clients than trying to get more substantial sells from a solitary customer.

In summary, there are a lot of gains to both equally the digital photographer and to the bride when the photographer basically gives the complete resolution and copyright launched marriage ceremony images on DVDs to the bride.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Friday, January 24, 2014

SEO Copyright Service: Achieve better search engine ranking - Search Engines - SE Optimization

Copyright protection is highly essential for original authors. But from search engines' point of view, SEO Copyright Service is required to give protection to original content. It makes sense both to the reader and includes keywords to make the website pages rank well in the SERP. It is one of the important components in search engine optimization.

As a webmaster, if you want to promote your website, then you need to write quality contents and get good rank in search engines. Search engine algorithms are changing in regular intervals and search gets more spam free, then the actual copyrighted elements of the SEO no longer hold true. If you want to make your copyright service successful, then you need to keep certain points in your mind. Some of them are discussed below:

* Optimal Copy LengthIn SEO copy right, not only keywords but also your overall page layout and the length of the page are important for search engines. Hence, focus on optimal copy length.

* Relevant ContentTheme relevant content has great importance in better search engine ranking. This improves the overall customer experience for the visitors on your website.

* Right Keyword PlacementIn SEO copywriting service, maintaining keyword density is the most vital factor. After selecting the targeted keywords, it is important to place them at right place. While writing copy for search engines you can put your keywords or key phrases in your title tag, headings, description, in hyperlinks etc.

If you are offering copy-right service, then you should know it well that there are certain places where this technique will not work. Some of them have been described below:

4. The websites that contains many photos and images can not be optimized using SEO Copyright Service. 5. SEO copyrighting service is a time consuming process. If you don't have enough time to do it by yourself, then you can hire an expert for this purpose. 6. In your website, if very competitive keywords are required, then it could take many pages to get yourself in Google SERPs.

The above points are very useful for a SEO Copyright Service provider. Follow these guidelines and get better result.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Thursday, January 23, 2014

How to Get a Quality PS3 Game Copy - Technology

Much has been said about the sheer power that a PS3 possesses, in fact the United States Air Force has utilized the PS3 in its research on supercomputers. For gamers the PS3 is a blessing sent from console heaven, however even though the PS3 has one of the best, if not somewhat limited, game library of any console in this current generation, one deterrent for people or gamers to buy it is that the copyright authentication of any PS3 game makes it hard for people who buy the game to make a PS3 game copy. Unlike the PS3's console competitors who use HD-DVDs or just plain DVDs, the PS3 uses Blu-ray discs for its games. This makes it easy to make a PS3 game copy.

And so in order to get around the copyright authentication protection, what most gamers do is use PS3 game copy software. There is actually a lot of PS3 game copy software found on the internet although not all are actually legitimate and some would not even work. Sorting out the software that work and those that don't work is really the challenge in choosing good PS3 game copy software. Indeed there is a huge number of sites that offer software for ripping or copying PS3 games, and choosing the site that offers or hosts a good PS3 game copy software might be akin to looking for a needle in the haystack.

When you choose to use PS3 game copy software, what is left to do is to run the game on your PS3. This is also something that needs to be taken note of because not all PS3 game copies will play on the PS3 especially if the PS3 is a relatively new SKU. Also, if it has up to date firmware from Sony then the chances of playing the PS3 game copy that you ripped from the Blu-ray disc on it would be really low. To get around this concern, most gamers modify the PS3's firmware to an earlier version for it to accommodate not only PS3 game copies but also older titles from your PS2 and PSX game libraries since most PS3 SKU's don't have backward compatibility for older PS2 and PSX games.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Who Owns The Copyright of Work Created By A Contractor? A Trap For The Unwary - Website Promotion

It's really basic: ownership of the copyright in work a business pays for can often be critical for successful commercialization of that work. Unfortunately, the U.S. Copyright contains arcane provisions that will often produce a counterintuitive result - leaving full copyright ownership with the contractor. How could this possibly be?? Internet attorneys, advisors and businesses cannot afford not to be aware of the applicable laws.

BACKGROUND:

When copyrightable work is created by an employee, the work can become the property of the employer in one of two ways: either by qualifying as a "work made for hire" as defined in Section 101 of the U.S. Copyright Act or by having the employee assign the work to the employer.

A "work made for hire" can be created by an employee or by an independent contractor. If created by an employee within the scope of his or her employment, then all such work is automatically owned by the employer as a "work made for hire." No written agreement or mention in an employee manual is required, though this may be recommended.

HOWEVER, when work is created by an independent contractor, then the law starts getting strange and, as time has passed, out of touch with reality. The work created by an independent contractor will only qualify as a "work made for hire," and therefore owned by the employer, IF (1) there is a written agreement that the work is a "work made for hire" and (2) the work falls within one of the following categories: "a contribution to a collective work, as a part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, as a translation, as a supplementary work, as a compilation, as an instructional text, as a test, as answer material for a test, or as an atlas." When was the last time you hired a contractor to prepare a test or an atlas?? If the work does not fall in one of these categories, then even a written agreement stating that the work is a "work made for hire" will not be effective in causing the work to be owned by the employer. In such a case, only a written assignment of copy right will be effective. Computer software, websites, graphic work, and music will often not be considered included in one of the "work made for hire" categories.

Let's be clear on this, the default under the law is that copyright will be owned by the contractor UNLESS there is a written agreement that the work is a "work made for hire" (if it qualifies under one of the listed categories) or the work is assigned in writing to the employer. This is a counterintuitive result - but that's the law.

To make things worse, what if a business has all of the correct documents in place with the independent contractor, but the independent contractor, hired a different independent contractor, and did not have the correct documents in place with this second independent contract. Well, you get the picture.

WHAT IS AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR?

There are multiple factors that can be applied to determine whether there is an employment or an independent contractor relationship. Here some of the factors that will be considered and no single factor will be determinative:

1. Does the hiring party have the right to control the manner and means by which the work is created?

2. Who provides the equipment and tools needed to produce the work?

3. Is the hired party working on the hiring party's premises or on their own premises?

4. Does the hired party have discretion when and how long to work?

5. Is the method of payment hourly or by the project?

6. Is the hired party getting any benefits offered to employess?

7. Is the hiring party withholding taxes?

IMPLIED LICENSE:

If you don't obtain copyright ownership in work you commissioned based upon the above analysis, then all might not be lost. Usually, when work is commissioned and paid for, then the hiring party and independent contractor understood that the goal of the project was that the hiring party was going to use the work that was created. This would create an implied license. Whereas, a "work made for hire" agreement or a copyright assignment, MUST be in writing, a license (other than an exclusive assignment) does not have to be in writing.

The complications begin when trying to define the scope of use granted by an implied license. For instance, if a website was developed for a business, then the business would have the right to use the website for the purpose for which it was created. However, could the business "white label" the website and license it out to third parties? Could the business modify the website or take components from the website and use them for a different purpose than for which is was originally developed?

BOTTOM LINE:

Make sure you don't fall into this trap for the unwary, and end up paying a lot for a product that you cannot properly exploit.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Copyright vs. Ownership: The Right to Jailbreak - Hobbies - Games

The infamous hacker George Hotz, a.k.a. Geohot,have been sued by Sony of America for publishing tools and information which may be helpful to "ps jailbreak (override the program limitations of) the Playstation 3 slim video game console. Sony alleges that Hotz' tools, by enabling gamers to experiment with illegally copied games, encourage copyright infringement in violation from the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Hotz case reflects quite a hotly debated question within the courts today: Who really owns a PS3?

The after-market modification of electronic devices is not a novice to Sony or any other digital camera manufacturers. Sony first experienced console modification with the original PlayStation, as some gamers would modify the console's hardware so that you can play illegally copied games burned on rewritable CDs. Soon after, Microsoft's Xbox console became a popular target of modification because of game save vulnerability which allowed gamers to pirate and modify games. Today, just about any company creating gadgets has to be worried about some kind of end-user modification: Hotz is usually the cause of jailbreaking Apple's iPhone, which allows the phone to work with different cellphone networks and Apple-prohibited applications.

17 United states of america Code 1201 prohibits the circumvention of technological measure[s] that effectively control access to copyrighted material. The Library of Congress provided an exemption for this statute for hackers like Hotz truly, after Apple sought to go to court individuals that ps3 break their iPhones. To enable his PS3 modifications to belong to this exemption, Hotz must show that his hacking was for interoperability that is, that his modifications encourage the PS3 to operate with some other programs , nor facilitate copyright infringement. Though Hotz does claim he earned a specialized effort to stop enabling piracy, his modifications nevertheless provided the education for some individuals to pirate, of course , if Sony can establish others are using Hotz's tools to illegally copy games, they might win their case.

Hotz's case represents a hotly debated legal issue within the courts today: The scope of ownership of electronics. As Hotz and others would argue, someone who purchases an electronic digital device just like a PS3 has unrestricted usage of their device: They can participate in it, hack it or even just throw them back a cliff. Such a complete ownership would allow consumers the unconditional directly to modify their devices, even though modifications would enable potential copyright infringement. Manufacturers like Sony would believe that parts of the device the built-in limitations and code especially are still the house and property of your manufacturer and they are thus illegal to tamper with. So ,, the buyer might be more being a licensee, who may take a device only in terms prescribed because of the manufacturer.

The visible difference in these scopes of ownership means quite a bit to the everyday person: If companies could control their devices after selling them, they could disable or change them at their leisure. Apple recently patented a means to remotely disable iPhones and iPads that exhibit suspicious behavior, which could be employed to remotely disable modified iPhones and iPads without warning. Microsoft used similar methods to remotely disable modified Xbox 360 system consoles in 2009. If left unchecked, users who've modified their electronic devices or use their devices incorrectly?? may soon find it remotely disabled by secretive updates or changes out of nowhere.

Though these methods seem draconian, you can find non-copyright-related explanations why manufacturers like Sony and Apple may decide to utilize them. In many cases, modified devices may have a detrimental relation to the quality of provided services. ps3 jailbreak iPhones enable network tools that are fitted with the wide ranging to heavily tax AT&T networks, seriously harming other consumers iPhone capabilities. Modifications to the Xbox allowed gamers to simply cheat at popular flash games, harming legitimate online competition. Theoretically, a version of a post-purchase control is needed to make sure all consumers can start to play some as originally developed ?a the debate, naturally, ends simply how much control is very necessary.

So who really owns a PS3 or another privately purchased electronic devices? That question may soon be answered through the courts. A remarkably similar Playing field of Warcraft-related tampering case could possibly be appealed entirely on the Supreme Court, as federal courts currently disagree regarding whether a copyright owner can sue whenever a consumer circumvents copyright protection without infringing copyright law. In spite of a real case, the battle between consumer autonomy and copyright protection rages on, and this will take much more time, litigation and legislation so that you can fully answer questions regarding scopes of ownership. Nevertheless, for the moment, a lot of things are certain: hackers like Hotz continues to perform new and innovative things with technology that toe the road of legality, and computer manufacturers will constantly be seeking new strategies to protect their proprietary interests from the ever-changing world

of electronic devices.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Monday, January 20, 2014

AUSTRALIAN COURTS TO DETERMINE COPYRIGHTS ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS - Law - Intellectual Property

Overview

A recent case Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 419 highlighted the importance of independent intellectual effort in copyright cases.

Facts

The beneficial owner of a trust, the applicant, purchased certain medical and dental practices on behalf of the trust. The applicant alleged to obtain the copyrights interest as part of the purchase of practices, which fell under computable income and as such was allowed for tax deductions from the net revenue of the trust. In this case,

Copyright was claimed for the following:

Prescriptions Health summaries Referral letters Consultation notes of the acquired medical and dental practices.

Findings

It was noted by Justice Stone that for a medical record to qualify as literary work it should contain some individual intellectual effort and so could copyright exist. All medical records that were claimed for copyrights were assessed by Justice Stone as follows:

Consultation notes that had only one author was considered continuous narrative, which displayed independent intellectual effort and so was qualifying for copyright protection. However, the consultation notes that had multiple authors were restricted.

Prescription consisted only of the names of medications, dosage and standard directions therefore was not qualified for copyright protection and also health summaries that had a list of previous illnesses and actions were restricted.

The referral letters contained intellectual independent effect and content were driven by the purpose of the letters so it qualified for copyright protection.

Outcome

Justice Stone found that in medical records like prescriptions, health summaries, referral letters and consultation notes do not involuntarily attract copyrights. So she determined that such records should be examined on a case by case basis which also displays the level of independent intellectual effort that would justify classifying the record as an original literary work for the purposes of the Copyright Act 1968.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Friday, January 10, 2014

What Copywriters Need to Know About The Proper Use Of Copyright - Publishing - Copywriting

I was recently approached by a copywriter who was confused about the proper use of copyright. He explained that the client had hired him for work, then canceled the job part way through, paying him for work done to date.

Perhaps because the work was unfinished, and thinking there may be some future use for it, the copywriter expressed that felt he should retain copyright, and was perplexed when the client got into a snit about it.

I understand the idea to save good work that never gotpublished, hoping to "recycle" it in future jobs. For years I hung on to a two-inch think file of unused concepts.

When a new job came along that required concepting, I'd leaf through the folder looking for something thatwould "fit" the new challenge.

Alas, I never did find a perfect fit between an old concept and a new job. And one day I realized I never would. That's because every job is unique. Every product is unique, every audience is unique, every marketing objective is unique. The strongest concept would once again have to come from my head. I threw out the contents of the file and never looked back.

So the lesson learned is that if you can't even recycle a concept, you'll never be able to recycle copy, which is much more granular.

Therefore it makes no sense to try and retain copyright; if your work is "for hire," meaning that you're being paid to do the writing, you can't retain copyright anyway.

The United States Copyright Act gives the purchaser of the work sole copyright. To understand the difference, you, the copywriter, would retain copyright of a work you did not do for hire. For instance, no one is paying me to write this article. So I'm able to retain copyright, and market the article as I see fit.

One final important note about copywriters and copyrights. You do retain copyright until the work is paid in full. So use this fact to your advantage. Make sure your Fee Agreement points out that you will retain copyright until paid in full. It's a powerful way to use the work-for-hire copyright law to your advantage; I'm sure that having this clause in my own Fee Agreement has saved me some grief over the years.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Why You Must Obey Movie Copyright Laws In The Digital Age - Law

Many people have pursued the hobby of downloading movies and songs on the Internet and sharing them with their friends and family online. However, this is direct violation of U.S. copyright laws. Not surprisingly, the biggest violators of the movie copyright laws are students. The movie industry is sending out copyright infringement claims to college universities around the country. One reason that college students may be the hardest hit is that they are not aware of how serious a crime copyright infringement is.

Many college students who have lawsuits brought against them are shocked, to say the least. They question why they were not warned about the perils of downloading movies and songs online and passing them along to friends. However, with the rise of claims, no one can claim ignorance for much longer. Word is being spread near and far that if you engage in illegal downloading and/or sharing, then you can be brought to court. College students are learning the hard way that it is against the law and in violation of copyright laws to share or download copyrighted material. Many colleges and universities now state in their handbooks that it is against the law to illegally download movies, music and other forms of media using school computers.

In addition to illegal downloading and sharing movies, the files take up space on the computer systems and use a considerable amount of bandwidth. While most universities and colleges will not look at the content an individual has -- they can isolate and identify the individuals who are hogging up bandwidth by using illegal file sharing.

The movie and music industries have stepped in and are demanding restitution for illegally downloaded movies, music and other forms of copyrighted media. They have detection agencies that have the technology to identify and trace copyright infringements straight to their source. Once the computer is located they can notify the university or the college that they are in violation. The university will be told that they have a copyright infringement claim against them. Based on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, once the computer is isolated, then Internet access is terminated to that computer and court proceedings can begin.

Does this sound far fetched? Well, it is not. You should know that a few years ago Recording Industry Association of America sued four students. These students attended Princeton, Michigan Technical University and Rensselear Polytechnic Institute. One student had an estimated liability of $150 billion. When you consider that you can be charged $750 per song that you illegally download, the total can add up fast! The good thing is the lawsuits against the college students were settled for amounts less than $20,000. That is not pocket change for college students -- or anyone for that matter!

Movies and music are meant to be enjoyed. However, illegally downloading movies and music is not much different than walking into a video store and sticking DVDs and CDs in your pocket. Be careful. You do not want to be caught violating any movie copyright laws.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Copyright Considerations for Web Hosts - Internet - Web Hosting

It is apparent that a majority of problems on the Internet generally relate to the web content. As a web hosting provider, it is imperative to protect one's company from copyright and trademark infringement. Web Hosts usually face copyright issue as an absolute minefield. Though the law fairly depicts the responsibilities for web hosts, but when it comes to the removal of allegedly infringing materials, the responsibilities appear extremely unclear to be met. On top of it, much to one's dismay, copyright complaints represent an array of challenges unique in their respective field of abuse. These challenges not only correspond to meeting the requirements of the law, but also in making the process as restructured as possible whilst also avoiding disturbed customers.

Copyright issues can become a serious problem for web hosts, until not a considerate thought out plan is worked out to tackle these issues to avoid loss of time, money and customers, maybe by also doing little to keep copyright holders happy. Basically, a simple and efficient system to quickly process the complaints and handle them such that the customers also ease down should be developed.

The copyright website owners own the content they create under the general principles of copyright law, which grants the author, "an exclusive right to copy and reproduce that work". The copyright law applies to the written word, music, drama, art, sculpture or any other form of creative expression, fixed in a tangible means of expression. The web world is easily prone to conflicts on copyright, as the technology makes it very easy to copy and download content by web users, and then republish it as a new article. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act has created a safe haven for web hosts who can follow a particular process to respond to notices from copyright holders alleging copyright infringement from content on a client's website. The web hosts are then also required to suspend the client's website or resurrect it. As long as the web host follows the specific requirements of the law, he is not liable even if determined by a court as violating another party's copyright.< /p>

These days major web hosts have a form to fill up when someone wants to complaint against their customers which would ask for all the information related to the copied content following which a copy is sent to the customer who has done this. Next they will have to remove the content within a specified time frame or the website would be suspended.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Is This Copyright Infringement? Two Common Questions - Law - Intellectual Property

When it comes to copyright infringement, there are a few commonly misunderstood aspects of what you can and cannot legally do with someone's work. Here, we'll work through three common issues so that you can make your best judgment and avoid copyright infringement.

Q: If I translate a book from another language, do I have to ask for permission to publish the translation?A: Yes. To understand why this is true, we have to look at the definition of something called a "derivative work," something to which the owner of a copyright has exclusive rights. Essentially, this is anything that was based on an already existing work, without which the new work could not have existed. Since your translation obviously couldn't have existed without the underlying work, it would be considered a derivative work. An as a copyright owner has exclusive control over derivative works, publishing a translation of a copyrighted work without permission is copyright infringement.

Q: If I find a picture online, can I use it as long as I mention where I found it?A: No -- if the work is copyrighted (which, given that an author automatically holds a copyright in the work that he or she created, is likely), your use is infringement regardless of whether you attempt to give proper credit to the author. While this seems harsh, there are two obvious reasons for this. The first reason is that distributing or displaying something is one of the specific exclusive rights granted to a copyright holder; the fact that you are mentioning whose work you're displaying does not allow you to take that person's right to control the display and distribution of the work away. The second is that given the reaches of the Internet today, you can't assume that crediting where you found the image is crediting the author at all -- if you don't see any contact information for the author, it's always safest to assume that the website you found the image is infringing on the auth or's copyright as well. You can always try emailing the webmaster about the image's origins.

Q: Will I get in trouble for copyright infringement if I review movies on my website?No, reviewing movies is considered fair use. According to the US Copyright Act of 1976, reproducing a copyrighted work "for purposes such as criticism [or] comment . . . is not an infringement of copyright." However, keep in mind that associated material on your website, such as photos of actors and actresses or movie trailers used without permission, likely do not constitute fair use.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Monday, January 6, 2014

How To Give Notice of Copyright On Your Works - Law

The use of a copyright notice is no longer required under U. S. law, but you should still give notice whenever possible. Because prior law did contain such a requirement, however, the use of notice is still relevant to the copyright status of older works.Under the 1976 Copyright Act, creators of covered works were required to give notice of copyright on the work in question. This requirement was eliminated when the United States signed onto the Berne Convention in March 1989. You should give notice of copyright whenever possible because it puts the public on notice that the work is protected by copyright, identifies the copyright owner, and shows the year of first publication. Furthermore, in the event that a work is infringed, if a proper notice of copyright appears on the published copy or copies to which a defendant in a copyright infringement suit had access, then the defendant cant claim innocent infringement as a defense. Innocent infringement occurs when the infring er did not realize that the work was protected.The use of the copyright notice is the responsibility of the copyright owner and does not require advance permission from, or registration with, the Copyright Office.Form of Notice for Visually Perceptible Copies The notice for visually perceptible copies should contain all the following three elements:1. The symbol (the letter C in a circle), or the word "Copyright"; 2. The year of first publication of the work. The year date may be omitted where a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work, with accompanying textual matter, if any, is reproduced in or on greeting cards, postcards, stationery, jewelry, dolls, toys, or any useful article; and3. The name of the owner of copyright in the work, or an abbreviation by which the name can be recognized.Heres an example: 2002 Jane DoePosition of NoticeThe copyright notice should be affixed to copies in such a way as to "give reasonable notice of the claim of copyright." The three elements of the notice should ordinarily appear together on the copies or container. In ClosingYou work hard to create books, articles, music and other items. Make sure you protect them by giving copyright notice.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Sunday, January 5, 2014

Avoiding Copyright Infringement when making a Website - Law - Copyright Law

When creating a new website, the first consideration you must have is the violation of someone else's property. If you seek copyright protection for own projects, you must be aware that the others will be conscious of their security too. Consulting a lawyer before copying or even considering someone else's work for inspiration, is preferred.

The United States Copyright Act gives authority to a copyright owner in six categories. Only the owner can reproduce his copyrightable work, anyone else doing so without his consent is liable of punishment under the copyright act; adapt his work or make any changes, whether it be additions or omissions, it is only the right of the owner himself; for distributing the work in public as books, pamphlets or banners, the concerned publisher must seek permission from the owner; any public performances such as speech, drama, film is the sole right of the owner alone; displaying work as exhibitions or art pieces also needs the owner's consent; broadcasting the work on radio or playing music on the loudspeaker is again a violation if it is not brought into the owner's notice.

Trademark infringement is using someone else's sound, logo, word or phrase in an obvious or confusing manner for similar goods or services. If you use another authority's trademark, people must not mistake your product to be the same as the other's; it should be used appropriately with legal advice.

Logos and trademarks of another company must only be used if direly required. Otherwise, if you can express and promote your product without any such help, it will be rather helpful. No matter how much you try to alter someone else's work or presentation, it can still be identified and you can be charged for copyright violation. Nominative fair use is a safer way to use a trademark or logo. This is used when you are selling a product through a store or online, and you use a trademark to describe or identify you product.

It is easier to protect your own rights but to be careful of the other owner's copyright is very important. Consulting a copyright lawyer before originating a project can assure your safety in case of any plagiarism charges. Sometimes copyright is violated without knowledge. Work picked up for inspiration can also be alleged for piracy. Legal help can drive the client out of such problems without much effort and trouble.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Saturday, January 4, 2014

Use The DMCA Takedown Notice To Deal With The Violation Of Copyright - Business

Finding an illegal or unauthorized use of your products online is very upsetting. One of the solutions for this issue is to contact an experienced and knowledgeable attorney for assistance. But in case you have not registered your product prior to the infringement, you won't be eligible for statutory damages. Attorneys take such cases only under particular circumstances and pursuing such an infringement will cost you a lot, as you will have to pay the attorney on an hourly basis. Another alternative is that you yourself send a cease and desist and/or demand for payment to the infringer but, such requests are mostly ignored.The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, commonly known as DMCA is another option. DMCA is a United States Copyright law that was enacted in 1998. It implemented treaties signed at the 1996 World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Geneva conference. It addresses a wide range of issues, as well as the rights and obligations of owners of the copyrighte d products, who believe their rights under U.S. copyright law have been breached online. DMCA also focuses on the rights and obligations of OSP / ISP (Internet Service Providers) on whose servers or networks the infringing material can be found. The DMCA takedown is an action taken by a copyright holder, his agent or any person who acts on behalf of the copyright holder, in order to solve a copyright infringement.Under this, the copyright holder or his agent requests a website owner, its hosting company or ISP to remove or block access to the material that violates the copyrights. This action should be taken by sending a DMCA take down notice to the website owner, hosting company or ISP. A DMCA takedown notice must be prepared as per the rules and the information mentioned in the notice must also be accurate and properly formatted, as it may otherwise be ignored by the website owner, hosting company and ISP. After the hosting company and the ISP have received the notice, the y must respond as soon as possible. It usually takes up to 10 days to remove content and block access to it.Guardlex.com is a leading online source that allows intellectual property (IP) owners to fight with the unauthorized distribution of their products or illegal usage of their trademarks, on the web. The company has gained recognition for serving a majority of businesses and individuals who have online businesses. Guardlex.com provides different segments of customers with a comprehensive solution and also offers them numerous Protection plans. The wide range of services offered by the firm includes DMCA takedown services, basic protection of website's content, as well as the Pro-Active protection plan which is known for providing maximum anti-piracy content protection.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Friday, January 3, 2014

Is Your Intellectual Property Protected? - Education

THE NOODLE-HEADThe other day I had quite a shock. A student who was taking one of my Internet courses e-mailed me to tell me that it was so beneficial "I emailed copies to all my friends and family." Thereby circumventing my $29.99 per course, and violating my copyright. Yikes!THE KNAVEI also market coaches. I design websites, including search engine optimization. In doing some work for a client, I discovered suddenly someone had overtaken them on the search engine. When I checked, it turned out they had completely copied the source codes I'd done, keywords and all. Not one word was changed.Double yikes!THE NERVEAnother client was checking out the competition on the web one day - he cuts plastics - and found someone had copied his entire entry page, just changing the logo and company name where needed. Same photos, same placement, same ad copy, same menu buttons... Busted!TIME TO CHECK WITH YOUR ATTORNEY ABOUT YOUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS?Check with your attorney, bec ause it's confusing. Even being a certified paralegal, I find intellectual property law daunting.According to the Cornell Law School website, "under current law, works are covered whether or not a copyright is attached and whether or not the work is registered." (This means registered with the US Copyright Office.) HOWEVER, the American Intellectual Property Lawyers Association [AIPLA] says the "registration... is not required for existence of copyright; however, it is a prerequisite to a lawsuit for copyright infringement and to certain legal remedies." [Source: /Content/ContentGroups/Publications1/Publications_available_for_viewing1/What_is_a_Patent_and_Trademark.htm ] They recommend you have a specialist draft the document.Does that mean you should get one? Is a of any use if it doesn't allow you "remedies"? I refer clients to an attorney.To get an official copyright, you can apply directly to the US Copyright office - /register. Here are a few of the things they list as being copyright-able:LITERARY WORKSFiction and nonfictionManuscriptsCompilation of dataAutomated databasesDissertations, theses, reports, speechesBound of looseleaf volumesPublished or unpublishedPamphlets, brochuresOnline worksApparently also included are website HTML code, source codes and website screen displays. Registration becomes effective on the day they receive your application, and the official Certificate of Registration will come 4-5 months later (hold your tongue!)There are also commercial sites you can register through. Here are three: /copyright-on-the-internet.html/gdshop/copyright/landing_choice.asp?isc=&se=%2B&from%5Fapp=Here is a resource which also explains the process: /registration.shtml Do you know the difference between a copyright and a trademark? You'll find a good review here from the AILPA: /Content/ContentGroups/Publications1/Publications_available_for_viewing1/What_is_a_Patent_and_Trademark.htm.Also on their website you'll find some educational materials, such as "How to Protect and Benefit from Your Ideas" - (/Template.cfm?section=About_AIPLA ).Apparently you will also receive something to place on your website more imposing than a .Check with your attorney for legal advice, please.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Thursday, January 2, 2014

Entertainment Industry and Intellectual Property Protection in India - Law - Intellectual Property

Entertainment is one of the most happening Industries in India.The forms of protecting such Intellectual Property can be by means of Copyright protection for the works and Legal Agreements between the parties in interaction & transaction. The model and mechanism of the Entertainment shows and mediums itself necessitates strong legal agreements; since the realization of the revenue in most cases is only after the completion of the work. Though the industry and services offered is not perceived the same way; as services offered by a business entity or organizations in a stream of business; the size of the industry has significant impact in terms of the mass reach, jobs created, economy and technology absorption. Getting to the details of forms of Entertainment and shows; the most common mediums are:MoviesTV SerialsReality ShowsRadioDrama ShowsLive Performances (Music and Dance)Sporting Events

Each of the above programs or shows is a result of the Script or Story writers, directors, Music Composers, Artists Choreographers & Technicians and Organizers. The kind of work that goes into creation of such a work will be in terms of the Story, Creativity, Music, Dialogue, Art works and technologies. The works are a result of Intellectual learning and applications. Hence there is a need to protect the Intellectual Property to retain the rights over the work; since copying of the work is very easy in case of cinematic works & publications.

The forms of protecting such Intellectual Property can be by means of Copyright protection for the works and Legal Agreements between the parties in interaction & transaction. The model and mechanism of the Entertainment shows and mediums itself necessitates strong legal agreements; since the realization of the revenue in most cases is only after the completion of the work.

The body for Copyright protection is the Copyright Office under the HRD Ministry. The Copyright works are governed by The Copyright Act, 1957 and This Act has been amended five times since then, i.e., in 1983, 1984, 1992, 1994 and 1999, with the amendment of 1994 being the most substantial. (Source: Copyright office website)

In India steps towards Copyright protection has significantly improved and campaigns against piracy have appreciated the industry to take legal measures and avoid piracy. With the industry size anticipated to grow from the present INR 652 Billion in 2010 to INR 1275 billion by 2015 (Source: FICCI Press Release); steps will be taken to strengthen the IP protection and reduce reproduction of the works.

Copyright - Brain League IP Services 2011; All Rights Reserved





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

Don?t get confused with types of Intellectual Property Protection - Law - Trademarks

Intellectual Property is an intangible asset that leaders of growing companies and entrepreneurs need to clearly understand. Today every business needs one or the other kind of IP protection and the choice of a correct kind of protection is very important. Some businesses would need multiple types of protection while the other may need just one type of protection. Deciding what would work best for you is important because a wrong kind of IP protection is as good as no protection. You would have heard people say trademark this invention, copyright this idea, or patent this logo, but as a matter of fact none of these are possible. So let's see what are the possibilities available to you.What are the various types of intellectual property protection available?The selection of correct protection depends on the material you want to protect. For e.g. you may trademark a logo or patent an invention. Following is an explanation of the types of protection available:

Patents: Patents are considered to be the strongest type of protection available. They can be granted for an apparatus or a method provided it is useful, novel, and non-obvious. Patents allow you to exclude others from practicing your invention for a period of 20 years. A granted patent can be enforced on anyone who infringes and the courts help you enforce a patent. Patents are also issued for Designs and have a protection period of 14 years. Companies worldwide try to patent their inventions and then earn royalty on the protection. Important point to note is that patents are jurisdiction specific and can only be enforced in jurisdictions where you have got the patent registered. Also, patents being the strongest type of protection are most time consuming and expensive.Trademarks: Trademarks are granted word, symbol, or a name that is used to identify a service or goods. They only protect the identity and not the underlined invention or creative work. Registering a tradem ark is less time consuming and less expensive than a patent but takes more time and money than a copyright protection. Though some protection for trademark is automatically granted as soon as the mark is used, but it is advisable to register the trademark with the national registering authority. A registered trademark can be enforced and the judicial courts help enforce registered marks in case they are infringed.Copyrights: Copyright protection is for a novel and original piece of work. Copyrights are granted for writings and other forms of expression and protect from unauthorized copying, re-production, and distribution. It does not protect the idea but protects the expression on an idea. They are the easiest and least expensive to obtain. is the universal mark for copyright protection. This right lasts till the person is alive and for 70 years thereafter. Though some protection for copyright protection is automatically created, but it is advisable to register the copyrig ht with the national registering authority.Trade Secrets: Trade Secrets are considered to be most delicate type of intellectual property protection. An example of a trade secret is Colonel Sanders recipe for fried chicken or formula for Coca. There are no legal procedures to register a trade secret. They can only be protected by signing non-disclosure agreements with vendors and employees and these agreements are enforceable. They last forever but are lost as soon as they become public.To conclude, it is important to understand the differences in the protection available and to go for the correct type of protection. Best is to do some background research before selecting the protection or take help from firms that provide intellectual property registration services.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software